Personal View site logo
Lens tests on the BlackMagic Pocket Cinema Camera (BMPCC)
  • 232 Replies sorted by
  • I can confirm the audio is more than fine when feeding it line level audio. Just make sure the BMPCC's sensitivity is set to match the preamps output (i.e. -10 or +4)

  • It's external for sure, you can't use the internal with a pre-amp.

    In my experience the audio in the BMPCC is quite OK when fed line level by a per-amp,

  • @FrankGlencairn Splendid work, really it's the internal mic with juicelink?

  • @matthere

    It doesn't really look fisheye, shooting through the center like that. I don't particularly like the look of wide rectilinear lenses and prefer a bit of bow. Looks very usable to me for ultra-wide but not skater video wide ;)

  • Hello everyone, I want to share my own experience with some c-mount lens. I've also metabones c-mount adapter and i'm waiting for another one

    Computar 12.5-75 f1.2 (serial 174566) The lens vignetting, need modification for infinity focus too. I think the mod is feasible.

    Rainbow 8-48 f1 - H6X8-II (serial 127745) Similar problem of the computar one.

    Canon 17-102 f2 - V6x17 Perfect! Seems to work very fine, it's parfocal and i will publish some video during this weekend.

    Angenieux 10mm f1.8 R21 Retrofocus Little vignetting, usable without modification (i use to crop the aspect from 1:85 to 2:35 so that kind of vignetting isn't a real problem for me)

    Anyway I'm trying to collect any kind of useful information about the computar and the rainbow to make the modification... Ciao

  • @FrankGlencairn Yeah, I saw it earlier and it's one of the reasons I'm looking forward to getting one of these cameras. Great short - very nicely shot and nice story as well.

  • If you guys haven't seen it, I shot this on a pocket. Mostly Samyang 24/35/85, a Nikon 50/1.4 and a 14mm Panny. Metabones Speedbooster was used here an there.

    Technical stuff and blog article: http://frankglencairn.wordpress.com/2013/09/18/the-1-shooting-a-short-with-the-bmc-pocket-and-much-coffee/

  • @kholi +1 re bmpcc w/ sigma 18-35/1.8 with speedbooster. This may be a good combo that yields similar FOV/zoom range as a GH2 from 20-40mm (assuming my math is right), which could possibly be a single lens that could work for narrative feature work, plus I guess speedbooster takes that 1.8 down to around 1.2, so very flexible. I will definitely test for this possibility in the near future. Now it's all about testing to see what type of image comes out of that combo after trying various camera settings and lighting setups.

  • Got a Kipon adapter today. It has a backlash so that I can still turn the adapter in the m43 socket a little. Not much, maybe not a mm, but it seems a little risky to damage the mount in combination with the heavy Variogon 18-90. I ordered the Fotga today :-/

  • @grierdill

    At frist I didn't notice much of a degradation at all, but as I started using it more (for a while it was always on the lens) I noticed fringing at the edges of the frame, and you could actually see that the overall image was slightly softer.

    It added something to the bokeh that I liked a lot, or the way the focus "falls off" from in to out. It would be hard to recommend it given how expensive large Wide Angle adapters are, but I can say that it was sharper/more pleasing wide open than the 12/1.6 SLR on the Pocket Camera, and almost as wide at that.

    Distortion was about on par, which was surprising.

    This is where I would be interested in seeing the 18-35/1.8 with the Speedbooster.

  • @kholi How do you like the wide angle adapter on the BMPC, think its a viable option without distorting the image too much? Also if you zoom with the adapter on does do you completely lose focus?

  • Received a Fotga C-mount adapter today, and for less than 10 U$ the quality is highly recommendable: Fotga C Mount Lens for Micro 4/3 Adapter EP-1 EP-2 G1 GH1 GF1 on Ebay

    It fit's a machined Tevidon (and all lenses that don't need machining) and it fits the BMPCC, while a few other Chinese ones didn't and were difficult got get off when stuck halfway.

    Fotga rocks.

  • Anybody in the US care to test a lens for me on your BMPCC? I'll give you a great deal. PM me. Thanks

  • Bmpcc / canon FD 35-70mm f4 24fps / 180 degree shutter angle

    sharpened in AfterEffects 70% unsharpen mask graded a little with frischluft curves

  • I should have known that it was a singular and korean "we", talking about stealth factor and bashing 12-35 lens.
    I should have known...

  • @Vitaliy_Kiselev

    Ahhhhhh, I knew it! Just didn't wasn't to get accused of starting anything. It's funny how the tone comes through no matter what screen name he uses. Think he got banned from BM forum recently too. He really is a sad human being for needing this much attention.

  • @kholi @vicharris

    It was our old korean friend :-)

  • I don't think "we" are talking about the pocket concept, seems like the same guy just talking to himself.

    Who's really that adamant about 1. their method and 2. everyone using this 14-45 that they join with two different names to agree with their own post?

  • There are some wonderful, very small primes in C-mount. Perfect stealth factor.

  • @nomad +1: Primes most of the time + 12-35 for doc, that would be my ideal set.

    Are we still talking about the "pocket" concept?! Really? I hope more cameras get delivered soon so we can see more footage and less endless pointless talk.

  • @nomad

    Yep yep and yep. The whole conversation is absurd :)

  • If you are on a film set with proper lighting and crew, I doubt you'll consider that lens (even doubt you'll use the BMPCC): crappy focus pulling, not even to mention zooming. Plus, it's rare to stop down to 5.6 even on a well lighted set. Sorry, mate, but horses for courses. Have a look at the distortion of those zooms at photozone. Even the 12-35 is bad enough at the wide end. No test from me, because I don't consider it for my work. For doc, I want the 12-35, for a film set I want primes most of the time.

  • The appropriate lens for the camera is the one that suits your desires.

    I personally DO want to make sure I have depth/ability to shoot wide open at a very wide aperture, sharpness, and solid color. The Sigma 18-35/1.8 pretty much takes care of that for me.

    Also, I don't subscribe to the "pocket" idea, and have no intention of using it as something like that. For me, it's better when a camera has weight or footage feels insubstantial.

    If you think the 14-45 is a good option then you know what you need. It seems like noone is interested in that lens, so that's why you aren't seeing it.

    I see footage in this thread, is there something else you're looking for though?

  • @dbp

    From everything we've seen it's a little better but you still want something fast to save your butt. That's why the speedbooster seems to be so useful and from some tests we did last week with a BMCC and the Pocket Cam, with and without the speedbooster, that extra stop really helps. I should have brought my GH2 so we could have done some side by side but we already had the two BM cams, a Sony FS700, some sort of Sony ENG camera and a RED there so we were already pressed for time. I'll try to post some of the footage whenever Hollywood Camera releases it to me but we tested the old Tokina 28-70 2.6, SLR Magic 25mm .95 and a few Rokinons. Maybe the 17.5 Voight but I can't remember since we were blowing through cameras and lenses.

  • Whatever. Good luck on that. Please post your results when you try to shoot something indoors with low light on that lens with a super16 sensor at 5.6. Fun time there buddy. I guess everyone else is wrong when they want and are using fast glass with this camera :)