Personal View site logo
Make sure to join PV on Telegram or Facebook! Perfect to keep up with community on your smartphone.
Please, support PV!
It allows to keep PV going, with more focus towards AI, but keeping be one of the few truly independent places.
2K BlackMagic Pocket Cinema Camera, active m43, $995
  • 4493 Replies sorted by
  • Hahaha, that's funny. I though you were trying to prove a deeper point.

    Well I bought the book anyways :)

  • see your point but it just drives me crazy that time and time again I see people have no idea what they are doing with this camera and then wonder why their footage does not look good.

    My quote just say why footage is much more frequently "not good". As all must match (knowledge, actual skill and talent in many areas) in exactly one guy. It is rare thing. Grading is also not so simple thing and requires skill and taste.

  • @Vitaliy_Kiselev

    I see your point but it just drives me crazy that time and time again I see people have no idea what they are doing with this camera and then wonder why their footage does not look good. I'm by far any sort of camera or color expert but every time I plan to make a purchase I research the shit out of it. I had never used Resolve before I got my first BM camera but you bet I watched many videos and read many blogs on how to work with and ingest the footage. I wouldn't consider myself smarter or more keen than the next guy so why do we see this time and time again? It's driving me crazy.

    I just wish people would take a few minutes before they post questions and research their problems. It would help out tremendously!

    Now maybe I should go buy that book ;)

  • @vicharris

    let me just provide simple quote:

    Playing Hercule Poirot for a quarter of a century would not have been possible for me without the help of many, many people, all of whom I owe my most grateful thanks. The television executives, directors, producers, writers, production teams all helped to make it an unforgettable experience. To all the teams over all the shows, to the costume designers, costumiers, tailors, dressers, personal make-up artists, set designers and the art directors, who made the production values of Poirot so special, let me say at once, I could not have done it without you, thank you all so much.

    I must also thank all the extraordinary and talented actors and actresses who have appeared alongside me and supported me throughout the years

    From "Poirot and Me" by David Suchet. One of the best books I read recently.

    http://www.amazon.com/Poirot-Me-David-Suchet/dp/0755364198/

  • Ugh. Same shit, different day :)

  • With grading, please go to one of many grading topics :-)

  • Learn to use Resolve systematically. You need to go to the RAW tab on the right (or to the RAW section in "Project Preferences") and set the project/clip to Cinema DNG/BMD Film + BMD Film.

  • Why opening ProRes and RAW source clips at Davinci Resolve 10 looks so different? Resolve opens RAW like very brut aggressive LUT? It almost not acceptable to begin work with any LUT (over-saturated, over-contrast and too yellow), just No LUT looks looks ok for start with it, but ProRes is opens very different, LUTs also not too bad to begin. Could I use some different preference for RAW?

  • Talking about "LUT is just decoding algorithm, it's not grading" thesis, I try to understand grading RAW and ProRes at Davinci Resolve 10. I try make grade without 3D LUT and basically I very like that starting point. But I also begin to know what advantage and disadvantage of LUTs, and I learn to using LUTs. One of great target of Captain Hook is make the picture and skin-tone less yellowish, and I found that is not easy to correct right to beginner Davinci colorist. My second test clip I used 1st time a Captain Hook LUT on ProRes, and overall sharpness was less my previous clip I done with BMCC Film to REC 709. I haven't touch any sharpness configuration yet. My question is: Are LUTs have different sharpness presets? I sure I was exactly at focus every shot at this clip with focus peaking.

  • @Aria

    You have very good points. I have wondered also what is this magical "film look" or "cinematic video". Is there some common principles of that. Hmm.., 24P, 1/48, shallow DOF, slightly personal colors.. BMPCC is cinema camera so it is reasonable to reach cinema look. But I think still that many people want to grade normal rich color looking videos too. It seems to be difficult with BMPCC. Is there somewhere easy instructions how to do that?

    I can clearly see from the movies I watch that there is no single look to any film i've ever seen.

    I have seen many films which has own special colors. For example many children movies has very bright and vivid colors and 2. world war films has some muted colors.

  • I'm a novice, but one thing that comes to my mind is that I can clearly see from the movies I watch that there is no single look to any film i've ever seen. I see many films intentionally use color to help tell the story using what would be considered off color grades. So why is it that there seems to be this Orthodoxy on what is the proper look for a film? It seems to me that if a person likes the colors they set for their film that there shouldn't really be any purity in this regard. I have seen great looking BMPCC footage and GH3 footage as well as other cameras, but they don't all look the same, so i'm not sure I understand the critique of many of the videos people have put up on the web. I do have a lot to learn and hope to learn how to properly grade my footage, but also think we should have the freedom to do what we like even if it's not technically correct.

  • Now can we all be friends again?

    :)

  • @lmackreath My experience is that RAW is much easier to "grade" - get colors right - than Pro Res. Resolve is really the only way to grade RAW in a reasonable workflow, and while it is not easy to master, it can get the job done. It is designed to color grade, unlike most software packages. Thanks for being a good sport, and I obviously agree with everything you say.

    Too many videos are "LUT-lazy"!

  • I agree with all of the above and as I have already said I am guilty of thinking that slapping on a LUT will make my footage look great and it simply doesn't. I think the main issue is the majority of the bmpcc owners are or were previously owners of gh2s.. Mk 2 canons etc and the colour and white balance were already baked in or taken care of by the camera. Yes you could do some basic colour grading on top but the truth is most of that 8 bit footage was pretty much pre graded if you will straight of the camera.

    Now all of a sudden we are presented with this flat log footage and cannot grade it correctly.. Ironically the kind of flat footage that we wanted out of our gh2s to give us the most latitude in post!

    Another problem is software. I have always used fcp x but it is clearly out of the box not capable of being used to grade prores log footage. The in built exposure sliders in fcp x simply don't work on prores footage and don't really change the exposure. This is only evident when you use nick shaws plugin and see how his exposure slider really effects the footage.

    I have also spent money on the lut utility for fcp x as well as the osiris filM Pack as well as filmconvert. Most of us all new to REAL grading and sometimes we don't have time to learn or the patience and would rather type in google " how to achieve the film look".

    I will get better over time I am sure.. I just think a lot of us bought the bmpcc thinking we could produce amazing images with it that would far exceed anything we ever did on our gh2s or canons. Spec wise we know the camera is capable of this but I am yet too see it in my footage and most of the bmpcc footage out there.

  • ha ha, Happy New Year!

  • to the oxymoronic "peaceonearth": "footage additionally killed by horrible sound."

    Can you elaborate on what you mean by this? Do you mean the sound is inaccurate? lacks dynamic range? has overloaded parts? distorted? Or do you mean there is actually a sound track capturing the ambience of the scene and you would prefer instead ("it's just tastes") no sound at all, just a pleasant music track like everyone else uses? Or are you just being spiteful from envy? 'Horrible' is not an audio technical term and thus of little usefulness.

  • Color (correction) grading is difficult. When people used DSLRs and camcorders with standard settings, it was not necessary, just desirable. Now with Pro Res and RAW it is required. There has been video after video posted where people just slap on a LUT, resulting in off-color, dull coloration or a pretentious pre-set "film stock" look. (How about "faded Polaroid"? Or maybe Tri-X?). And for some reason many posters defend this as art, or the highest praise - "not video."

    In my view it is a shame, because in fact the content and visuals of most of the videos are excellent (like the family Christmas video). It is patently obvious that for most of the videos little effort was put into what is pretentiously called "grading," but what is really necessary color correction for flat RAW videos that come out of the camera. The result is often (not always) a color monstrosity by any standard. You cannot hide behind "art" or "it's just tastes" when someone just slaps on a preset LUT ("Look I made my video look like S16 film! I am an artiste").

    There have been some great examples of color grading. I just find it incredible that one second of moire attracts negative comments, but almost any dis- or mis-coloration of an entire video from some odd LUT gets at best no notice and sometimes praise.

    Vesku is not knocking the BMC's. He is knocking the same thing I am - the poor results from ill-advised "grading." The many (not all) posted videos make it seem like the BMC's have some color problem. But it's all user-induced - LUT-mania.

    It would be art if the grades were different, but they are almost all the same, because people are just using the available stock LUT's as a shortcut to the hard work needed to get either natural (the horror!) color or an actual personal creative look. Captain Hook's videos are great (and his LUT is actually a useful starting point for grading). I can spot a BMC video instantly, not because of the great dynamic range or high detail, but because of the not-been-seen-before dull, odd-colorations.

    I feel better now :).

  • @vicharris

    I dont hate BMPCC. I dont have nothing against anyone. I am sorry if I am not able to conversate politly about MATTERS. I have considered to try BMPCC but it seems to be very difficult tool. I am a little surprised that some people are so sensitive about commenting their color grading. I can see that it needs lot of work and effort and many are just learning to cc. If I would share my gradings I would be thankful for negative comments too because only that way I could develope my skills. Is it very helpful if everyone just says "Nice grade" or "wonderful video"? Of course cc is personal matter and taste but can you honestly say that there is nothing wrong with this BMPCC color cast thing I have asked.

    ".....it's because people actually have to learn how to grade the footage....." ------How can they ever learn if nobody says honest opinions or what must improve-----

    @lmackreath They say I am too harsh to you with my comments. Do you honestly feel the same. If yes then I apologize you.

  • @lmackreath I tested a Glidecam HD1000 which works pretty well with the BMPCC if you don't rig it up. As everybody will jump on brushless gimbals it should be available second hand for a good price quite soon. Worth a try but you will need to practice, practice & practice.

  • Like I said in my previous comment, this was a lazy grade which has the m31 lut slapped on it. It would not surprise me if a lot of people use this lut plus others from the Osiris pack to grade their log bmpcc footage.

    The footage with the bmd film lut looks a lot different and does not have these color casts seen in a lot of videos.. But simply the colours from the scene I shot. The problem with the BMD film lut is that it's not a grading lut.. It just converts your log footage to 709 rec video., and that's what your footage looks like..Very video like.. Similar to the gh2 or mk2. The skill in grading is to on top of the initial lut to create a mood.. A feeling... An emotion that you want the footage to convey. Editing these days with the plugins available make it too easy for one to use Osiris.. Magic bullet looks..filmconvert..and with one click say " now my footage looks like film" and most of the time it simply doesn't. I am guilty of that clearly but am willing to learn and listen...

  • throwing stones, throwing stones gents.

    Also @Vesku Not sure how many times different people have to tell you but it's all about grading here. I know you love the GH3 and think it's the best camera in the world and keep on bashing the pocket cam but it's because people actually have to learn how to grade the footage. It isn't a point and shoot GH3 or even GH2 where you get a colored pic right out of the box. We all get that you hate most of the stuff coming out of this camera but I'd suggest you go look at some of the stuff Kholi has shot as well as a few other people.

    On average it takes me 5 nodes just to get the pic to what some might consider a good neutral grade but I'm sure colorists can do it much faster. I bet Shian can knock it out in 5 min tops.

    And then lastly, maybe people are tired of the same damn dslr type colors we've seen for years and enjoy the look of S16 film and other old stocks.

  • @lmackreath

    Thank you for sharing your family Christmas moments.

    I too want to comment colors of your video. I am again a little confused where this little green/brown cast comes with BMPCC videos. I wont believe that people buy this wonderful camera and then want to have colors a little like old paper photographs. Especially with family videos. There must be some issue with grading workflow because so many are getting results with same color errors or unneutral tonality. And almost always same look. It would be an incredible coincidence if so many had decided to use this "look". I dont want to criticise in negative manner. I just hope that my comment will help you or somebody.

    I suggest to take a photo of same scene with proper camera and with auto white balance. That would be a sample of neutral grading of the scene. If you then want to cc to some "look" it is OK. I think that most people still want to shoot neutral rich colored videos with their BMPCC. I dont have BMPCC so I can not help with grading process.

    I might know partly where this yellowish/greenish/brownish cast comes. In movies there is a certain film look. I think that movie projectors uses a little yellowish light compared to monitors and TVs. Many people has then adapted that look in their brains and when grading for cinematic look grade becomes too yellow. I see that yellow/green cast at TV when movies are shown and the older the worse. Some TVs has color profile "cinema" and again colors with that profile becomes yellowish. Some or actually many movies has own color world and there is often cyan/yellow/brown combinations.

    This is maybe becoming too philosophic and of course every one can do whatever want with camera. I am just wondering....

  • Bar the grade I feel my vid is a great record of a family occasion made with heart and love..it tells a story of that day for those on it too young to appreciate it right now.

  • @mark041 You don't have to be a dick about it man, you didn't see anyone grilling you for all the obvious and overdone warp stabilizer applied to your recent videos (among other issues). Constructive criticism is one thing, straight up slagging other PV members is not very cool. It's true that a lot of people have a steep learning curve in grading footage from this camera. Tips would be the gentlemanly thing to do. For example: learn scopes and try to grade on a calibrated monitor, if possible. Use reference wipes and take stills with a DSLR during shoots for great looking reference material to try to match. Keep practicing and every once in a while go back to old grades to see if you can do them better.

    @lmackreath Great coverage, a lovely family memory! I'm sure it will be cherished for years to come. I've found interior lighting to be the hardest to get looking natural. Outdoor is another story, much easier to get a nice natural, warm and saturated look.

  • @markr041 taste is a personal matter.

    I liked his video and to be honest up to now I denied myself a comment about your absolutely boring videos with featureless footage additionally killed by horrible sound :-P