Personal View site logo
Official Panasonic GH3 topic
  • 1288 Replies sorted by
  • Ill copy over the all- i matrices and produce a setting based on the gh3 for the gh2 as an experiment in a day or two

  • Why would they even post the pictures with a disclaimer like this?

    "NOTE: These Beta Sample Images were shot with a preproduction prototype Panasonic GH3 and have been resized to 4 megapixels. Image quality is not representative of final production models."

  • @amateur, yup that note lol. I'm sure Panasonic is reading all the criticisms on this thread lol

  • @AKED I am glad to hear about the volume control during recording. Thank you for finding out. :)

  • @duartix Thats fine with me.

  • @AKED Your image samples have been available early in this post for quite some time (like 20 pages ago). ;) VK pointed to them and asked people to go easy on the downloads so I uploaded them to mediafire. I hope you don't mind. IIRC they were also linked in the rumour site some days ago.

  • Good news:

    I just received the information, that it is possible to modify the audio levels during recording!
    It can be done via touchscreen in the video-menü !!

    Dieter

  • I'm going to buy one and add banding and FPN in post if it isn't there already. I loves my banding....

  • is there any chance of take the All-I mode from GH3 firmware and add it to GH2 ? eventually when we will be able to download it ?

  • For weddings I'm prolly gonna pick up the 12-35 combo. Pros: Proper 3.5mm jacks for mic/headphones, battery grip, weather sealed, high rez screen, looking more PRO, less noise in high ISOs, heavier=less drift with steadycam, stabilized fast lens. Cons: moire/aliasing? If they fix that one con (big one, though) I'm all in!

  • can someone use Neat Video NR in the video i show'd in page 48?

  • @berniez I asked, they did not know. I send a long list of unanswered questions to Panasonic. This was one of them.

    In the menus of the GH3s I played around with, there were only PAL framerates.

  • Yup, it's 4-2-0 alright.

    Here's a frame grab from one of Dieter's GH3 videos. This is enlarged 2X with nearest neighbor in Photoshop. You can clearly see the reduced chroma resolution around the man's head in the red and blue channels.

    This is no worse or better than the GH2 or thousands of other cameras out there. But it does force you to make compromises when pulling a key.

    4-2-0.jpg
    987 x 325 - 152K
    RGB.jpg
    329 x 325 - 77K
  • I could live with the GH3's slightly increased crop factor however the biggest issue I still see is the apparent increase in moire/aliasing over the GH2.

    Once the GH3 is officially released we'll soon know whether the moire seen so far is the result of the GH3's internal lens correction or not.

    If the moire only appears when correction is used, and as long as Panasonic doesn't pull any Canon 5D MK3 style filtering stunts which will kill the fine resolving power the GH2 has been famous for, then I think overall the GH3 will be a winner.

    Fingers crossed!

  • I just checked the GH-3 specs at B&H. The video section only lists 60Hz frame rates. Does that mean there is a PAL version and an NTSC version?

  • @konjow I did not feel it. But the camera I played around most had the 14-140 attached and the new speed only really works with the new ones, 12-35 and 35-100. I had one with the 12-35 and there is was not terribly fast. But I am sure that is fixed with the final firmware. Markus Matthes (senior product manager) said, that the speed will still improve also the "speed" of the viewfinder.

  • There is no BIG issue on FPN (fix pattern noise) and i come to belive the iso 28.000 is very software made, since FPN should be much more evident in such mode. If not, the sensor is some good mother...fu..r.

    I also belive new way of color dithering is aplied in this GH3, since its 8 bit and all footage ive seen and analize seems to handle better color, the banding, and 8 bit tipical color problems are not that harsh too.

    In my opinion those features by itself and improved sensor is enough to buy one. In GH1 and belive me, iso 6200 was shit, and seeing this GH3 iso looking like iso 800 on GH1 is about as good as it can be for a 2 generation step in sensor or camera. Canon is a sensor slave, look how many "APS-C" cameras they have with same shit sensor, even their new generation mirrorles. On every GH series there was a unique sensor, we have the "look" that somehow GHx m4/3 can achive even at AVCHD. Now the coder is much improved, tha camera is of alloy and stuff. Ive reed this thread and for what i can see, sensor wise, was panasonic the designer of it, and the circuit behind it in other layers is sony design... So, somehow we wont loose the look from pana.

    I think is it will be much much better than GH2, like x 3 if proper hack is developed. h.264 is more open standard by itself than AVCHD... and you have the benefit of quicktime for those mac pussys. So..who knows..maybe even only 24p, 4K is possible with new encoder at h.264. It has much better prosessor.

    If sony helped a bit by making this possible, way to go men, only panasonic manages the firmware, design and hack wise knowlege as far as this website can give. I think the developement was for shure hack influented and we will have some good surprises when this is possible. We count on you @VK. :D

    I think is a win win for all of us.

  • @aked "it was not the final speed" but was there any improvement in video autofocus at all or is it just theory for now?

  • It was not the final speed yet as far as I know

  • I read the page in panasonic.com it clearly mentions about new auto focus mode in video which could probably track subject better. lets hope for better continuous focus on moving subject. did anyone tested this option with 12-35 x lenses????

  • Did you google? :)

    But Sensei is for japanese arts. I am from a flipino art :) More in PM if you want.

  • @Thank you Dieter Sensei! ;-)

  • And one with only 125 ISO

    ISO125.JPG
    4608 x 3072 - 4M
  • Here one 6.400 ISO

    ISO6400.JPG
    4608 x 3072 - 4M
This topic is closed.
← All Discussions