Personal View site logo
Official Low GOP topic, series 4
  • 586 Replies sorted by
  • @paglez Yep I remember doing that weeks ago. Dont switch off after a span record, but record a single quickie clip to stabilise the file allocation table on the card.

  • Quantum v9b BETA *** Best all REC MODES QP Yet! ***

    Only change from earlier released v9 is 1080p24 is back to 6080808 frame limit for stability on death charts. Plus, Max ISO LIMIT Removal on, 30min Removal On, Languages On, PAL<>NTSC On.

    Quantum v9: Quantum v9: (if it already works for you, you don't neccesarily need v9b)

    Video buffers put back to stock. 1080p mode tuned (slightly higher on frame limits) on AQ4 1080i tuned higher as above on AQ4 720p tuned higher as above on AQ3 seems best. mjpeg mode slightly detuned due to death chart failure (needs verifying) DETAILS: Video Bitrate 24H=154000000 Video Bitrate 24L=112000000 Video Bitrate FSH/SH=80000000 Video Bitrate FH/H=60000000 Auto Quantizer for 1080 modes=4 - All to details Auto Quantizer for 720 modes=3 - Most to details 720p50 GOP Size=3 720p60 GOP Size=3 1080i50 and 1080p24 GOP Size=1 1080i60 GOP Size=1 Encoder setting 1 1080i/p=1 1080p24 Frame Limit=6080808 60fps Frame Limit=1413779 50fps Frame Limit=1687144

    Quantum v9b BETA - slight adjustment - setj.zip
    931B
  • Jspatz: Try this metod: After record a long file (spanned) shot a few seconds (only 3-4 seconds). I had a similar issue and I solved it this way

  • They are all fine on nle. The problem is that I might be stopped further recording and I can't play back for client and checking. Do you think unchecking 30 will address these 2 issues, at least for 24l?

  • @Jspatz copy them over to your hard disk and theyll be fine on the nle. The quality is way better than anything out there. Its worth it. Try unchecking > 30 mins Recording and see what happens. Also try battery out/ back in, change a setting, turn off, then turn on again and see if it records now.

  • Quantum V9, Sandisk 64Gb 95mbs. Dramatically better quality all around. The best I have seen. Everything spans

    The bad news: No spanned clips play back in the camera or mediaplayer. After creating spanned clips in 24h, no further recording is possible. No message but the recording indicator flashed briefly and stops.

  • My tests were tripod (probs the voigtlander differences over a panny lens). But fair does, just take it down to the usual 6080800 on the Frame limit then, it won't crash so easy!

  • When doing crash tests I have found that if I hand-hold the camera (no matter how steady it seems) it won't fail. Sometimes, though, if I use a tripod it will - and quickly at that..

  • @shian

    If I do a manual sample and set is it possible to see where the temperature is at after I take the reading?

  • I think 100 Kelvin increments is tight enough. I've always used it to set WB with great results, this was the first time I ever tried to use the sample function, and was surprised to see the noise pop up.

    plus you can save your WB result as a preset

  • @shian try quantum v9 first. The Q is amazing. @tobnyot H and L passed my death chart tests with a voitlander 0.95 at f4, 400 iso sample.

  • Hmm, that really sucks for those of us wanting to use a grey card to WB.

    Will using the the temperature adjust feature come close to what we'd get with a grey card, or are the steps too big?

  • I realize I'm behind the curve here, but made some discoveries this week while testing for a patch to shoot heavily stylized Blade Runner type footage. (all tests are with 24H setting at ISOs 200, 400, and 800.) (edit: All tungsten lighting and WB)

    The EOSHD's Roadrunner patch is unusable for what we're trying to do (Hazy noir type lighting with heavy crush in post). Data rate hovers about 25Mb/s, and when shooting haze/smoke it produces a TON of noise and Artifacting, and the data rate drops to 14.

    Quantum v5 is noisy at anything short of - 1/3 EV. The data rate comes in at a consistent at 149Mb/s but won't span on my San Disk 32GB 95 card.

    We've settled on shooting Q v2 which hovers around 88Mb/s, spans just fine, and produces a smooth fine grain even at -2 EV.

    Also, with all patches, I've discovered that the manual white balance sample and set function (the next to last option to the right) creates noise. You really need to either use one of the presets or dial in the balance by adjusting the temp (last option on the right), using the sample white function to set white balance creates something similar to the ISO bug, insane noise.

  • @driftwood I did a quick test with Quantum v9. Image quality looks great in 24H and 24L. 24H fails at spanning and the death chart which is no problem for me. A problem is that in 24L spanning doesn't work with my SanDisk 30 MB/s card.

  • *** NEW *** Quantum v9 The Rate Controller!

    This is the result of trying to harness rate control back with high bitrates and INTRA. Now you will see your recordings Q vary more (on some of the settings) according to detail being filmed. This has possibly a much better chance of spanning too. Settings: 1080p24H=154000000 (154M) 1080p24L=112000000 (112M) 1080i/720p FSH/SH=80000000 1080i/720p FH/H=60000000 Auto Quantizer for 1080 modes=4 Auto Quantizer for 720 modes=3 720p50 GOP Size=3 (GOP3) 720p60 GOP Size=3 (GOP3) 1080i50 and 1080p24 GOP Size=1 (INTRA) 1080i60 GOP Size=1 (INTRA) Encoder setting 1 1080i/p=1 1080p24 Frame Limit=6128320 60fps Frame Limit=1413779 50fps Frame Limit=1687144

    This enjoys very good Q and needs testing on detailed real world subject matter. Let me know how you get on. Got a sneeky feeling we're getting close all rounder with this one. Some of the pictures I have shot with this patch have been stunning.

    Test away! Nick

    Driftwood Quantum v9 Beta - setj.zip
    843B
  • @driftwood sorry, I have no windows machine around here, so I can't use Streamparser. But I did a comparison shot between Quantum v7 24H, Quantum v7 24L, Quantum v8 24H & Quantum v8 24L. I attached frame grabs, a direct comparison & a direct comparison with adjusted levels. If you want the .MTS files, I could upload it for you. I used the Panasonic 14-140mm lens with OIS off and the cam was on a tripod. Aperture was 18, shutter was 1/8s, ISO at 160, focal length 140mm and I used the variable movie mode at 300%. I recorded 1 minute which resulted in files with a length of ca. 20 seconds and I made the frame grabs at 10 seconds. Quicktime 7 shows the following bitrates:

    Quantum v7 24H 142.86 MBit/s

    Quantum v7 24L 102.25 MBit/s

    Quantum v8 24H 104.84 MBit/s

    Quantum v8 24L 103.47 MBit/s

    For me Quantum v7 shows a slightly better result, especially at 24H. For long shots with 300% at 24L I like Quantum v8 better because it spans, which v7 didn't for me as soon as the scene got a little detailed.

    Quantum_Comparison_Levels.png
    1920 x 1080 - 970K
    Quantum_Comparison.png
    1920 x 1080 - 7M
    Quantum_v7_24H.png
    1920 x 1080 - 6M
    Quantum_v7_24L.png
    1920 x 1080 - 5M
    Quantum_v8_24H.png
    1920 x 1080 - 5M
    Quantum_v8_24L.png
    1920 x 1080 - 5M
  • Guys, this is where I'm at with Quantum v8. I am looking more at setting up AVC rate control so that it performs allocating bitrate to detail quality. Presently, limiting the frames (Frame Limit = 6080808) keeps things constant (ie it will always record fixed i frame size for all frames). This is nice and high but wastes a lot of space for details not necessarily requiring that amount of bitrate. This is proven with the V8 patch, that if you record the same scene you'll see the bitrate being controlled more effeciently, the problem is high detail where the frame size needs a much higher requirement. The only way to enable bitrate to required quality (a part of rate control) is by lifting the frame limit to a higher setting (back towards the default like here in Quantum v8) and changing Quantisation. However in doing this, anything above 800,000b for frame sizes for more than x amount of seconds will eventually cause a write fail. It seems for INTRA (not other gops) a frame setting limit of around 6080808 is max. Now we are looking at matching all the other settings around this which means changing a lot of things like IQ, Q, Time, buffers and bitrate to alter the encoder to these factors we have found for INTRA. If we can crack rate control, we should be able to sort out a lot of problems which currently cause the recording to stop, spanning, and most importantly quality.

  • @tobnyot Interesting results. Is there any way you could report your quality findings with streameye or similar QP/macroblocking results?

  • @chauncy Qv8 is very experimental - I already know death chart failures. But under most normal conditions the bitrate will now go up and down rather than constant on streamparser/streameye etc... and the Q looks in some cases more stabilised. However, taming it is a bitch at this early stage. We keep going... we keep testing... but I need to see how good QP is performing and what is causing macroblocking with these settings. Thanks once again for your strict testing and results. Nick

  • @bumkicho Thats an issue with lots of patches with extreme cards it seems. The 6th footage should be able to be recovered. Keep the whole private folder together - copy it to hard disk - and perform one of the Panasonic AVC tools 'recover' proggies. Links are all over personal-view so do a search.

  • Something strange happened on the job today. I hacked my GH2 with quantum v7 yesterday and it seemed stable with 64GB 95MB/s card. But this morning on the job, after taking six footages (each footage about 3 minutes long), I got a message saying I reached the maximum numbers on files. I had to pull out d7000 while downloading the footages from GH2 and reformatted the card, then I was able to take a few more. When I got home, I realized that 6th footage was corrupted. Has anyone encounter this issue before?

  • @driftwood I tested Quantum v8 today with 24L and 300%. I used the Voigtländer 25mm/0.95 and a 16GB SanDisk 30MB/s card and spanning did work until the card was full. Quicktime 7 shows a average bitrate of 50-60MBit/s. Quality is great, but I think there is more macro blocking in dark areas than Quantum v7, but I didn't do comparison shots.

  • @driftwood not sure what I'm looking for. You know the drill with my test by now. 14-140 with some slow and quicker zooms.

    All of the 720p60 h and sh write failed. With af on/off with zoom fast/slow all of the 1080i 60 failed fsh and sh. Same as above.

    They all write errored right around the 3-4 sec mark. This was with sandisk 30mb/sec. They even failed when the camera was motionless and af off.

    Since all of these failed so quickly streamparser doesn't have a lot, no up downs since it just fails. 720p sh is 2pframe, 1 iframe, both right at 230000. Same on h, values a little lower.

    1080i fsh all i frame at 450000.

    same on 95mb/ sec just lasted longer.

    for 24p: went out to 40 seconds before stopping(not fail, I just stopped filming). I frames in streamp show some up down values. From 510000 to 680000. One big drop to 340000.

    I am moving the camera and periodically zooming in with af so that's to be expected, I think.

  • @rbna answering your question on the http://www.personal-view.com/talks/discussion/1888/gh2-post-production-workflows thread. Thanks @sohus. I was just about to post that link but you beat me to it!

This topic is closed.
← All Discussions