Personal View site logo
Star Wars: Imperialism Awakens
  • Short synopsis

    Imagine if Harry Potter and all characters surrounding him grown up and one day waked up in Star Wars universe. Imagined? Well, you now get the idea how Star Wars: The Force Awakens" looks and feels.

    Almost forgot, you also need to imagine that they killed John Williams and replaced him by Siri who made all music (out of the Beats radio tracks).

    Longer no spoiler version

    What can be made out of script produced by three completely drunken people who watched Episode 4 one time and though that this is enough? Btw, some style and idiocy of Little Miss Sunshine is also present.

    What can be made out of new bad actors who lack any charisma or acting skills and talk like cheap sitcom characters and few old guys who are here for money mostly?

    What can be made out of very bad soundtrack (to quickly grasp the idea - imagine same Harry Potter with JW and after him)?

    What can be made out of tons of unnecessary CGI made without purpose and stealing any possible time from story development (I am not telling that this idiots ever had any story worth telling you, no, god forbid me!)

    What can be made out of 3D conversion for a film that was not even properly shot (wrong plans, wrong moves, various size film stock had been used) and edited to shine in 3D?

    Finally, if you put Episode 5 as 100000, Episode 1 as 1000 and Zombievers as 0 you will need to go further to the left for this Episode.






    Few small spoilers and rants

    Why the hell was to kill (sic!) Expanded Universe for this?
    Thrawn Trilogy alone (and computer games that are also part of EU and preceded TT ) have much better story and much better characters.
    Here you have only some computer generated weirdy stuff (dark master, again, on hologram) and some young idiots.
    Absolutely no logic and explanation of events (contrary to EU).

    Ok, you are out of ideas and only watched Ep. 4 (copied almost everything from it).
    So, you need another Death Star. Bigger. This one I get.
    But can you please explain me, why you need to destroy planet if you can soak the star? Why?

    Will be updated.

  • 60 Replies sorted by
  • @jleo

    I think it is 1001th video about same thing, with around 90% taken by stating super obvious things.

  • New shit will hit the fans soon

  • Only since Christmas.

  • They're more like digital experiences, with references and reverence to existing iconography and other cultural touchstones.

    This is why I wrote my previous post, it is good idea to use recommendation as it is not a movie, but it is sold like one :-)

    You can even enhance you Star Wars experience by ingesting powerful psycho active drugs.

    Merry Christmas

    It seems like you had been under some drugs :-) And for quite long time.

  • Best thing is watch Star Wars movies with the understanding you not watching anything resembling a "movie". They're more like digital experiences, with references and reverence to existing iconography and other cultural touchstones. Just let it wash over you like a warm ocean wave, taste the salt and feel the energy and love. You can even enhance you Star Wars experience by ingesting powerful psycho active drugs. Or go with a kid and just watch the kid's joyful reactions and don't bother with the antics on screen. It's all good. May the force be with you. Merry Christmas.

  • To express my sincere thanks to creators of this... thing, want to inform you that it is available at no cost, this means for free, at some places called torrent trackers. And may the money stay with you... always.

  • Colin Trevorrow, director of Star Wars: Episode IX, said that he wants to shoot his movie using real film.

  • Few bits about sound

    The team was a mix of JJ’s regular guys from [his production company] Bad Robot, along with people who were veterans from working in the Star Wars film universe. I think it was important to him and Lucasfilm to keep some of the threads continuing from the previous films, and that meant working with people who had a history with them.

    http://www.avidblogs.com/sounds-of-star-wars-the-force-awakens/

    It is fun how big money can cover even quite bad work.

  • He continues, "I can understand that someone might say, 'Oh, it's a complete rip-off!' We inherited Star Wars. The story of history repeating itself was, I believe, an obvious and intentional thing, and the structure of meeting a character who comes from a nowhere desert and discovers that she has a power within her, where the bad guys have a weapon that is destructive but that ends up being destroyed — those simple tenets are by far the least important aspects of this movie, and they provide bones that were well-proven long before they were used in Star Wars."

    http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/race/awards-chatter-podcast-jj-abrams-853171

    It is like stating that as other piece of music used same basic notes you just copied it and resold.

  • Oh I didn't know this was some kind of official debate.

    I do know the hype, marketing, and product tie-ins don't hold a candle to the Phantom Menace. That was insane I doubt we will see anything even close to that again. TFA was rather tame, compared to Episode I's marketing.

  • I wish Chewie would have had a bigger rage reaction after "The big surprise". I wanted to see him rage tearing apart storm troopers and just going nuts. He just walked past Leia too towards the end. No emotional response.

  • @Chaos123x "I actually heard" is an invalid statement. I don't know about anywhere on the globe but in France, It was everywhere from street adverts to the internet. We even saw weird product placement such as La Poste (letter & package/parcel company) having star wars goodies for their products. Even some Banks had advertisement. I'm pretty sure they didn't "PAY" anything to them though since having "STAR WARS" written somewhere is a source of income. It's likely they worked it out for a mutual benefit if not the company actually paid Disney (which make it far worse).

  • I actually heard the advertising budget for this movie was a lot less than most blockbusters as Disney was mostly advertising on their own networks and relying on synergy with abc, Disney XD, ESPN, and the like.

  • Nice movie in my view. A good match for Spaceballs, not as amusing but still laughable...

  • Remember this? Star Wars kit bashed, "A series of clips mashing up George Lucas’ sources of inspiration with the first Star Wars movie. He plans on publishing a book about his research."

  • How Disney Bought Lucasfilm—and Its Plans for 'Star Wars'

    Iger understood Lucas’s concerns. “George said to me once that when he dies, it’s going to say ‘Star Wars creator George Lucas,’ ” he says. Still, Iger wanted to make sure that Lucas, who was used to controlling every aspect of Star Wars, from set design to lunchboxes, understood that Disney, not Lucasfilm, would have final say over any future movies. “We needed to have an understanding that if we acquire the company, despite tons of collegial conversations and collaboration, at the end of the day, we have to be the ones who sign off on whatever the plans are,” says Alan Horn, chairman of Walt Disney Studios.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/bw/articles/2013-03-07/how-disney-bought-lucasfilm-and-its-plans-for-star-wars#p5

  • "clearly lacked any ambition besides making money": this. IMO Revenge of the Sith has set the bar very high (even if uneven), and this TFA thing doesn't connect with it in any meaningful manner; I'm talking about artistic continuity, not in-movie time period... I find it disrespectful even, not just lacking ambition.

    However, as of Jan 1st the film has grossed $1.2 Billion worldwide...so in the end we should simply commend the Disney corporation for knowing their customers well and increasing value to their shareholders. A cleverer movie would've had less mass appeal. A story has to work on three levels to appeal to all types of viewers, but 90%+ of the public never sees past the first (popcorn) level. For me it failed even on the first level - weak acting, nonsensical props (lightsaber guard etc) - but the popcorn public sees them otherwise.

  • Eventhough I love SW, I am not a star wars "die hard fan", but I grew up watching the original trilogy as a kid, that gave me dreams and interest in science fiction. I was more excited about possibilities than the films themselves. For TFA I wasn't expecting much... I really disliked the prequels for obvious reasons. There was the original take on the story which was interesting but only in small amount, because in my opinion telling the story of young Vader was a huge mistake. You don't take a mysterious myth and try to explain it later if you don't have something extraordinary to tell, which obviously wasn't the case at all.

    I watched again all 6 films before going to theatres for TFA. The prequels were atrocious to watch again (now I know I will NEVER see them again) and the original trilogy was fun but deeply flawed. It had so much potential but already ruined back in the days (hello ewoks), so even if i love star wars I can't say objectively they were "perfect" movies... far from it. They just succeedeed to bring dreams and a vast universe to explore and dream of.

    Now for TFA I would say I was almost pleasantly suprised. I knew it was a remix of IV so no disapointment story-wise (that was a very coward move from them but I understand the fear they had to go original). It was funny at some points, I loved the spaceships battles (x-wings, ties, etc) even if there wasn't enough. The characters were ok, not very deep that's right but at least the "stupid decisions" you see in most movies nowadays seemed very light so that is a good point. Kylo Ren was a good concept but not necessarily well executed. Once he removes his helmet, aside from the disapointment in seeing a teenager looking like a Harry Potter mate, the character itself becomes weak from that point. He looked like a badass first half then he's a crybaby for the 2nd half... that seemed weird. They should have put more emphasys on the madness of the character to make it feel coherent and interesting.

    Snoke rhymes with joke. The design is ugly, the concept is dusty, Phasma was more interesting in the marketing department than in the film itself.

    All in all, it was a brainless entertainment, it was fun, it could have been much worse, but clearly lacked any ambition besides making money. Let's see what they do with the other films... but i guess it'll be the same feeling.

    well... to summarize my feeling: it was emotionally satisfying but failed at making me dream. It is a comercial rollercoaster success but a creative a failure. Now what were your expectations regarding this movie? I think that question sums up all post reactions for this new film.