Personal View site logo
Panasonic LX100 camera topic
  • 566 Replies sorted by
  • @karl, thanks. I usually just white balance with my palm, glad to know that LX100 can MWB nicely underwater. Not every cameras were created the same. I tried GH2 some years ago and it couldn't MWB underwater without a red filter.

    @danz, Fakarava is my dream place, wish you can share you video when you are back. Which port are you using? I am using the 3.5" dome.

  • @kkfok: Red filters just take away light, they had their use with analog film, but a digital camera can computationally compensate the white balance and still benefit from the larger amount of light that reaches the sensor without the filter. As @danz already wrote, the LX100 is very good at that - just use the "custom white balance" settings and use a grey card or something else neutral for the reference shot to set it up.

  • I have bought also the Nauticam housing and I am diving now in Rangiroa and Fakarava. You can adjust very easily White Balance. I prefer this in stead of using red filter.

  • I will use LX100 in a Nauticam Housing at Socorro very soon, do you think a red filter is necessary? I still have a few magic filters.

  • @PauloTeixeira: For the purpose of near-surface shooting, the Nauticam housing is probably overly expensive - for the situation you described a much less expensive(*) bag-type housing (like this one from ewa-marine) should be sufficient.

    (*) ewa-marine bags seem to be sold somewhat overpriced in the US, in Germany, the D-B bag is sold for for 161 € - including 19% VAT. But the US retail prices for this bag are still ~5 times below the price of a NA-LX100...

    Your experience was really a sad one... but as you said, much worse things could have happened had the waves taken you to the ocean... plenty of people died in similar accidents in past years.

    @deedive: I won't be able to deliver before mid of April...

  • cant wait to see some more underwater footage?

  • I wish I had that housing when I was in the Azores last month getting a lot of 4K footage. It'll be great seeing your underwater footage being shot with the LX100.

    I posted some video of the Azores in an earlier post of this thread. I Thought a certain clip I shot looked a bit over exposed and so on another day, I decided to go to that spot again to re-shoot it. Once I shot it, I decided to go down to where the ocean is. While walking down, I had to go extra slowly because of how slippery the cement was. Then when I got to a good spot, I decided to take a shot. I then put the camera back into my pocket. While I was about to head back, a big wave decided to hit me. Once the water got back into the ocean, I started walking and then saw that a second wave was getting to me. I immediate ran to grab onto the wall of rocks just so I don't fall. On the way to go back up, if I third wave were to get to me, well, lest just say it would be very hard to get to a well and who knows what would have happened.

    I ended up getting out with just some scratches and a sore elbow and at the same time being soaked from head to toe with water. I'm sure the people must have been wondering why I'm walking around the city covered in water. As expected, the LX100 got destroyed with the water. I did end up putting the camera inside rice but I have no idea if the camera is good. I do know that the battery is gone for good. I I actually rented that camera from a rental house and currently awaiting to find out how much it'll cost me to fix the camera. To make matters worse, the clip that looked overexposed really wasn't that over exposed when I watched it on my TV in the US and in fact, it looked better than the clip it replaced. I had always put the camera inside a plastic bag but on the day it happened, I did not go with the bag. As mentioned, the ground was already very slippery but for some strange reason I still decided to go their.

    Unfortunately their was some more places that I wanted to shoot with that camera and couldn't. At least I was able to get a lot of shots as is before that incident happened. I'm still very bugged by it to this day. I just have to remind myself that things could have gotten much worse. I could have been badly injured.

    Reminds me of another incident in the Azores. Summer of 2005. I had bought the Sony HC1 camcorder. I decided to take a lot of scenery shots with it. Now in one particular spot, their was a mountain with a hot springs pool at the bottom. I decided to climb the mountain just to get a wide shot. When it was time to come down, I decided to go down with my back side to the mountain just so I don't mess up the camcorder which I had put in my pocket. Yes, my pocket was big enough to fit it. All of a sudden, I slipped and then grabbed onto a ledge. If that ledge wasn't their, I would have hell into the hot springs. The water isn't actually that hot since people swim in it but still, the camcorder would have obviously gotten messed up.

  • Hmmm... I'd rather not, you never know whether they appreciate personal contact. I'll keep my LX100 between me and them :-)

    (The attached is a screen shot from a video I took at Maya Thila, Maldives, 2013. Will dive there again... this time taking 4k videos :-)

    shark.jpg
    640 x 360 - 51K
  • and probably will do so end of March, when I'm off to my next diving trip :-)

    Kiss them for me, ok?

  • @Vitaliy_Kiselev: I already did shoot some sharks from that distance (and less) in the past... and probably will do so end of March, when I'm off to my next diving trip :-)

  • @karl

    Are you going to shooting sharks from 2 meters next?

  • Got my Nauticam NA-LX100 housing yesterday. For obvious reasons, I had to change my profile image on this occasion :-)

    image

    na-lx100-klein.jpg
    1920 x 1440 - 884K
  • image

    There's a lot to like about the Panasonic LX100. It bridges the gap between some of the very small fixed lens compacts and smaller mirrorless systems, offering a reasonably priced pocket camera with a built-in EVF and 4K video capability. Stills image quality is high.

    http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/panasonic_lx_100_review.shtml

    hdd30.jpg
    563 x 599 - 108K
  • 3840 x 2160 only, no C24

  • Does this camera record cinema 24p 4k or just 23.976 4k?

  • image

    We found the colors produced by the sensor to be both attractive and realistic. The dynamic range is great, though it is definitely easier to recuperate details in the shadows than in the highlights in post-processing. As for high ISO performance, it is very good up to 1600.

    http://www.mirrorlessons.com/2015/01/28/panasonic-lumix-lx100-review-part-ii/

    hdd21.jpg
    800 x 533 - 68K
  • How can I find out the remaining time of 4K video on my SD? It gives information for photo but not for video.

  • VK, I just took the plunge on this baby. Could not afford a GH4 at the moment, so figured this with my GH2 on Moon t7 will be the best for now. I have two quick questions for you.

    1. Do you think this camera will ever get hacked?
    2. Do you think Panasonic will release a firmware update that adds Cine-D and extends the 15min limit? Thanks in advance for your reply.
  • Just got my DMW-LFAC1 automatic lens cap for the LX100. Citation from the Operating Instructions:

    Before cleaning the auto lens cap, wipe the auto lens cap with a dry soft cloth.

    It doesn't state what to do after cleaning the auto lens cap, but I guess I'll wipe the auto lens cap with a dry soft cloth afterwards, just to be on the safe side :-)

    Later in the document, about two thirds into the whole text, another very important hint:

    Be sure to read the operating instructions of your digital camera.

    I'm sure that everyone who bothers to read the DMW-LFAC1's instructions up to that point has read the whole LX100 manual at least twice :-)

  • Would this fit into a bmpcc cage?

    You need to open Panasonic specs page with body dimensions and do same for BMPCC.

  • Would this fit into a bmpcc cage?

  • I decided to also upload that video to Vimeo in case people wanted to download the 4K file. I took away over 3 minutes worth of footage just to sort of make it flow better. People can always watch the YouTube version to see everything.