@kholi If it wasn't ironic with the Q&A catalogue it would be great. If it was ironic I apologize as I fully understand that it gets boring being asked always the same questions.

I don't own the BMCC therefore I use only Resolve lite without moire filter option. I played around today looking for a quick and not too complicated method to handle moire. see the result. I had no time for color adjusting but I am sure you can level colors quite similar in in all these app

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/8273739/test_RAW.mp4

my raw 10 seconds

@Kholi

Nice. hang on, motion 3 is BMCC 2.5k?

@Vitaliy_Kiselev

I don't have the data rate, it's somewhere in my emails, but the frames will come in at at 1.5 - 2.4Mb a frame. I've been able to spike the recording to a steady 2.4Mb a frame extended over the period of 8 minutes.

@lmackreath

Actually, yes and no. The DNGs from the Pocket behave differently than the DNGs of the 2.5K in that if you expose them properly, they don't look over-exposed. So technically, you could just take them into your NLE and export that, and have something that's more saturated than Rec709.

However, if you go into Resolve and select BMDFilm, you'll get back to a Logish space to grade from.

We've discussed this with BMD for a bit, on how the files actually look much more pleasing versus over-exposed on the Pocket camera.

@kazuo

https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B8-f-XPnmOp6R0dsMzdxREtzN2M&usp=sharing

There are three videos there depicting the same shot from two different cameras, the Pocket Camera and the 2.5K, labeled motion_1, ..._2, ..._3

I did these yesterday with @Vic_Harris prior to the release today.

Both shot at 24P, one has a Rokinon 35 @ about 4-5.6 on it, the Pocket has the Sigma 18-35 @ 28mm on it.

They're all presented at 1920 x 1080, two of them are the Pocket camera (one has been sharpened in Debayer settings).

Edit: the other two files in the folder are both derived from RAW as well.

@Derek

Think its the same as when using BMCC, RAW only records in Film mode, because of the wide latitude. But you probably could monitor in Video mode.

Anyway, the footage looks kinda sharp. Hope someone will compare BMPCC and BMCC RAW soon. i dont have a Pocket, so cant do it. It'll be instructive to put compressed(lossless) DNG, and uncompressed DNG side by side.

@Derek: that's odd, as soon as I switched to raw I lost the video option and could only use film mode.

@Vitaliy on the short test of raw I did earlier, all frames were just under 2Mb in size, 1850kb to 1914kb to be precise

8 sec Raw video, was in video mode , clip was render 2 times plus vimeo so 3 times i use 1 Davinci because my adobe premier cc gave me error to import Raw from camera , so i use Davinci Resolve 10 to export and after render again in final cut x, resolve in windows sistem, after macbook pro 13

@Vitaliy

There is no random glitching if you're using the right cards. I've been shooting with three different Pocket RAW Betas over the last month or more, have stress tested it to hell and back with death charts and death scenes, and never have I encountered a random glitch.

battery drop tests, iris switch tests, shutter ramp and random menu button press testing, while recording to a hyperdeck out testing.

It works, plain and simple.

try to update APProCC. The latest has support for cinema DNG raw

The Sandisk Extreme 80MB/s cards actually only have a write rate of 60MB/s (max). At that rate I believe you're hitting the lower limit. So no, they're most likely not good enough.

Very good news. But it'll be interesting if it won't glitch randomly, as they state lossless compression and this can bump bitrate on very complex scenes.

Yes, seems you now need at least SanDisk Extreme Pro Class 10 64GB SDXC 95Mbps cards.