Personal View site logo
If El Mariachi and Primer cost $7000, why can't you do it cheaper? Here's why.
  • 73 Replies sorted by
  • @Manu4Vendetta ugh...wasn't a big fan of Following but it defenitely showed Nolan's potential, potential that was more than realized with Memento.

    We defenitely need a list of sub $10k films that we can study and see how they did this and that. I will always feel that El Mariachi and Clerks DVD special features and commentaries are film school 101, you can learn 90% of what you need to know just studying those movies, but there's always something new that can be gained.

  • @Vincent_Pereira I know it's easy to take some of this type of stuff personal, but I know you're cool. I've seen Clerks multiple times and heard all the commentaries multiple times but it's been years since I heard them so I'm going as best I can from memory, I'll easily defer to your recollection.

  • Christopher Nolan made 'Following' with U$6-8,000

    @Endotoxic, me ha encantado tu proyecto, y es sorprendente el resultado de venir de alguien que no estudio cine. Tambien soy diseñador grafico y he estudiado algunos cursos de cine. Proximamente codirigire y sere DP aparte de coescritor de un corto y me estoy volviendo loco. Tu trabajo tiene una excelente cinematografia, al parecer cuenta con buen ritmo y se ve bien actuado. De conocer gente como tu en mi pais, hubiera colaborado gratuitamente con mi GH2. El enlace de facebook no funciona, me gustaria conocer mas de tu experiencia. Me gustaria agregarte a facebook, animo con tu proyecto, asi se hace.

  • @CRFilms: My clarification re: the budget wasn't aimed at you but at Gabel who said CLERKS only cost $10,000 with the rest going to music rights. CLERKS was actually shot much in the style you prefer. The few scenes that had to be broken down into "traditional coverage" were not filmed in the "Hollywood" coverage way- i.e., the entire scene being shot straight through from many different angles multiple times- but they rather tended to be broken up. For example, an actor might make it half way through a take then flub, and rather than reshooting the entire take, on take two they'd start one or two lines before the flub, then shoot a cut-away reaction to bridge the edit, or move the camera to a different angle to facilitate a cut. The specific cadence that Kevin was going for in the dialogue delivery was largely worked out during the extensive pre-production rehearsal process, which was a HUGE help in keeping the actual shooting ratio so low.

    Vincent

  • @Vincent_Pereira Sorry I forgot or didn't know the $27k also included the screening print. And ultimately the "multiple" takes is a stylistic difference between him and myself. I prefer the Rodriquez method of shooting, also in a sense the French New Wave Jump Cut method of just keep shooting and cut out the mistakes. For those that don't know Vincent is the "View Askew Historian" and has worked with Smith.

    @endotoxic If my post upset you, I apologize, clearly based on your post and trailer, my post wasn't talking about guys like you. You did everything I listed that needed to be done either instinctively or by seeing what others had done and taking those lessons and making them your own. Well done. And yes some things are easier done outside the US since the guerrilla style works even better in places you don't need shooting permits though then you might have to worry about being shot at by real guerrillas. :P

    @jrd Fair point on if they'd get distribution now, but that doesn't change the fact that they're great movies and they had the talent to capitalize on their luck, Carruth sadly excepted. But even that shows you can "make it" and then go nowhere. Those 4k submissions to me just means 3k crappy movies ultimately. Since while the entry barriers have been lowered, the amount of true talent using those tools remains the same.

    And remember, Rodriquez was originally just going to sell it to Mexican video and was prepared to only take $20k. That would of still been $13k profit so his next movie would have had twice the budget. ^_^ Take away film costs and all these movies would of only cost around $500-$3000. So if you make a great movie for around $1000 and can only get $20k from somebody willing to buy it, $19k profit you can put into the next movie.

  • Hola @subco.

    Gracias por aprecias mi esfuerzo

    Aun no he terminado y falta grabar mucho. Creo que unas 8 fechas mas a 10. Pero con el tiempo y un trabajo reciente que puede ser que me traiga buenaventura, pueda ser el que me ayude a finalizarlo. Quiero 2 horas de calidad, y quiero lograrlo aun me demore 2 años mas. Pude venderla pero la verdad perderia su espiritu y no cumpliria con el rol que ha estado cumpliendo. Romper el esquema de realizacion de largometrajes aqui en el Peru. Todos hacen cortos, es facil hacer corto, pero terminar un largo a esta forma y con tu propio dinero rompiendo estandares de realizacion y produccion personalmente demuestran mas que hay otras formas de hacer cine en este paiz que es plagado de argollas y circulos de cine que ce cierran y no dan oportunidad a que vengas nuevos talentos. Demuestra que si se puede. Sobre el precio de la camara mas los 2000 dolares, me parece bueno para un largometraje hasta ahora. Tampoco es que todo sea gratis, pero no conozco otro caso de terror a este nivel en largo que se haya realizado con esa cantidad aqui en el Perú.

  • @ChainsawFilms has said the truth of the, i think, real filmaker.

  • Make your film because it's your passion. If it "gets you into the industry" then good for you, but don't count on it.

    Do it because you're compelled to tell the story inside.

  • @robmneilson

    It is hardly the massive amounts of low budget films that gets in the way of good low budget films to be watched. Well, maybe if you only consider online distribution.. But serious projects usually get taken seriously, also online.

    The real problem in comparison to 60's cinema is current theatre and distribution monopolies.. the market and industry as a whole. Who would want to take risks on 0$ films that no-one know about when there are 100 000 000$ films that have been marketed for another 100 000 000$? Then add to that the intricacies of distribution networks that rely on such films and add a few Indies just to please a certain part of customer - well, there is really no market for a 0$ film! Obviously, Cinema of the 60's is no longer, only the manipulation and entertainment of the masses.

    There have some examples of how online fame can help a film get into the right distribution networks (free marketing is no worse than expensive marketing) so it is of course possible, however increasingly difficult.

    Independent theatres have very small budgets and fringe audiences, normally - so 0$ films that are good and found by the right enthusiasts will still have quite few viewers..

  • Hello. My true name is Jonathan Briceño De Luise.

    Im from Perú, and i am in the NO BUDGET filmaking, i have achive already 30 minutes of grate footage with a lot of effort, good location, and using the things we have. My vision was more dynamic than i thought and my experience before was cero. I never filmed before, and never wrote a script, either study fotography or audiovisual stuff. Im only a graphic designer. I dont come from a wealthy family, but i can say i had a good education and know some people with the chances of helping me. I shoot in the center of Lima, in a bad place near prostitudes, drug dealers and thieves in an abandoned house for 3 days, pay 2 cops in their free time and then i call my fathers friend for use his slauther house (where you kill pigs and cows) for 1 shooting day. I allways recall people that can actually help me and i pay nothing cos sometimes dreams are bigger than money. I promised my friends and i delivered what i said visually. I have spend allready no more than $2000, the only thing i rented was the dolly and some cheap arri lights. I got my GH1 hacked and used 2 more cameras canon T2i and Canon 60D. I MADE MY ONW LIGHTS FROM CHINA BASED SHIT that reflectors for the garden and stuff, wrote a script from nothing, and decided to make a movie last year. I have allready 4 days of shooting in diferent moments of 2011, very separated times and each one was quiet unique. I never make anyone do what they dont want to, and im always open in the shooting day for consultation and advice from ANYONE. and i said ANYONE, the one that cleans and the cops any data is GOOD cos is a diferent perspective. My friends help me alot, and belive in me. Food and transportation is not a problem when you have all set up. My actors and all are friends that wants to make movies and dream about it. i cant take a no for an answer and effort and hard work pays off. Every shooting day was only for like 8 hours. I directed, make the photogrpahy, wrote the script and payed for everything expept my friend s cameras. if you want it to do it make it happen. 3 month ago a big company in my country wanted to buy my idea, and make a 1 million invesment, FUCK THEM, FUCK THEM HARD, i have crushed the ring of movie making here, going against every fucking rule that should be the standard in making a movie, and i think i have achived a diferent look, with a diferent aproach, i was badly critisaised by productors, and friends cos my shooting way was diferent, IT DOENST MATTER HOW YOU DO IT, JUST DO IT. with 0 experience in making movies here, i made something that was never make here in the history of peruvian cinema. Terror. Its in russian i dont know russian only spanish and english. BUT I DONT CARE lol.

    Look, 30 minutes of footage, less than 2000 bucks, 4 days separated in between and 32 hours of shoting in total, i think i have achived something good, and i dont care what @CRfilms said you can do it, but not IN THE USA ANY MORE.

    Whatch for yourself and if this is just shit, then tell me and ill stop for real!! it will go out next year though. i have 6 herniated discs and had back surgery in 4 if them, i now have a fucking protesis with 6 scres and kind of a makpherson suspension in my back and thats why i couldnt continue, this year will be diferent!!!! im better now, with no pain no gain.

    here is the back stage day 4 :

    https://www.facebook.com/video/video.php?v=10150891949425343

  • CLERKS cost just over $27,000 to bring a 16mm print to Sundance. "Music licensing" didn't come into play until Miramax bought the film at said festival, but Kevin indeed did spend over $27,000* to get the film in the can and have a 16mm print made for festival exhibition.

    Also re: "multiple takes" in the first post. CLERKS shot with a very modest 3:1 shooting ratio. Very few scenes had a lot of takes, and many had only one or two.

    Vincent

    • I believe his folks lent him around $3,000, and Scott Mosier put some cash in, but the bulk of the money came from Kevin and his credit cards.
  • @Aria @ Albertz I believe the same to be true ; )

  • Of course the one big problem now is over saturation. Back in the 60's if you could get your 16mm finished and printed you most certainly could get a distributor to watch it. But now with so much low budget crap, the cream doesn't really get a huge chance to rise to the top.

  • Having a staff -it doesn't matter if your friends work for free- is half the work, indeed. However, I think that most of the people with a poor budget only attempt to recreate Hollywood-look film,failing miserably, instead of discovering a new approach to filmmaking. This is due to the fact that even aspirant filmmakers (who should have a good background as a "spectateur") often know only hollywood films (and its bad imitation). History of cinema is full of masterpieces by directors having no money - I say no money, not low budget under 30 000 $. Last week, I talked with Mario Masini, an Italian cinematographer that in the late sixties worked with the great director/actor Carmelo Bene. Bene, with his very small troupe (only 6 people) realized his first masterpiece "Our Lady of the Turks" (second prize Venice Biennale 1968). They shooted in 16 mm because they had no money (and Jean Luc Godard himself was strucked by the quality "I can't believe it, it seems to me 35mm!", he said). Masini used only 12 mini spot lights (only 150W each). Next films by Bene were shooted in little set, I daresay claustrophobic.. ("Don Giovanni" is set in his living room, 3 x 3 m ) however, editing was so fast (3000 clips!) that you will never complain a larger set!

  • My personal philosophy is to never accept that something is impossible, just because it's hard. All the obstacles mentioned aren't problems without a solution!!! I've read nothing here that suggests others shouldn't try and learn from the success of other low budget film successes or not try just because it's hard or takes a lot of planning and some luck. Meh!

  • I once went to a panel discussion on "Producing no budget films". Toward the end of the discussion one of the producers said "And please go see our film at Sundance". Then one smart guy in the audience spoke up and said "Hey how do you know you are in Sundance, they don't even release the list for another month." She didn't respond as they all walked off the stage.

  • Keep in mind Clerks didn't actually cost below $30k. It actually cost around $10k, most of the money was only for licensing music.

    But this were some great thoughts. This is why a good producer is important, they can get you the contacts needed, favors from people and so on, to get things made!

  • @kavadni

    ...pornographic zombie splatter road movie...

    AJJajajaja, no doubt the will succeed and cheaper the better.

  • I often ponder what type of movie could be made relatively cheap. I mostly end up with something along the lines of 'knife in the water' and 'dead calm' both movies have pretty much a cast of three. (dead calm wasn't cheap .. but perhaps it could have been)

    Both work by introducing a third protagonist into a staus quo of two. Many road movies work the same.

    If I had a script .. send me one .. I contemplate a road trip across Australia .. I don't think $7K tho. About $100K is my wishtimate .. (you have to wreck a couple of cars)

    In discussions with mates we recently decided that the best bet for success would be ... A pornographic zombie splatter road movie .. something with the production values of killer tomatoes :)

  • Clerks and El Mariachi were made 20 years ago, when the Sundance Film Festival received something like 200 feature submissions a year, rather than the 4000+ they get today, and when everyone and his uncle wasn't making movies. And both films exploited the then prevailing interest in no-budget filmmaking for its own sake, an interest which is long dead now. Today, Clerks would never get distribution and El Mariachi is very doubtful.

    Primer is a more complicated case, but in itself proves nothing. The fact that somebody wins the lottery every week doesn't mean the lottery is a viable career. And "Primer" happens once every 10 or 20 years, not once a week. Note also that Primer wasn't a commercial success and apparently hasn't led to a filmmaking career for the director/writer.

    The better example for these times is something like "Paranormal Activity". But that example again proves nothing other than the fact that with a certain kind of material and a certain execution, there's always a chance of hitting the jackpot. That doesn't mean no-budget filmmaking is a sustainable filmmaking model.

    Note that Americans currently spend hundreds of millions of dollars a year on the hope and expectation of becoming movie directors, so dismissing these 3 examples as meaningless, over a period of 20 years, isn't entirely theoretical.

  • Great, I am glad that somebody pointed it out.