Both iOS and Google Android transmit telemetry, despite the user explicitly opting out of this. However, Google collects a notably larger volume of handset data than Apple. During the first 10 minutes of startup the Pixel handset sends around 1MB of data is sent to Google compared with the iPhone sending around 42KB of data to Apple. When the handsets are sitting idle the Pixel sends roughly 1MB of data to Google every 12 hours compared with the iPhone sending 52KB to Apple i.e., Google collects around 20 times more handset data than Apple. In 2020 it is estimated that in the US there are 113M iPhone users and 129M Android users. Assuming all of the Android users have Google Play Services enabled then scaling up our measurements suggests that in the US alone

Apple collects around 5.8GB of handset data every 12 hours while Google collects around 1.3TB of handset data. When the handset is idle the average time between iOS connections to Apple is 264 seconds, while Google Android connects to Google on average every 255 seconds i.e. both operating systems connect to their back-end servers on average every 4.5 minutes even when the handset is not being used. With both iOS and Google Android inserting a SIM into the handset generates connections that share the SIM details with Apple/Google. Simply browsing the handset settings screen generates multiple network connections to Apple/Google.

A number of the pre-installed apps/services are also observed to make network connections, despite never having been opened or used. In particular, on iOS these include Siri, Safari and iCloud and on Google Android these include the Youtube app, Chrome, Google Docs, Safetyhub, Google Messaging, the Clock and the Google Searchbar.

More in https://www.scss.tcd.ie/doug.leith/apple_google.pdf

Firm many years ago made the trend of making cheap plastic stuff with hi-tech look.

Nothing is made to last, nothing is fixable and any parts are very expensive.

As they had big profits it allowed them to use lot of presstitutes (and also ads).

One year ago, in almost total informational silence, the COVID-19 HPC Consortium group was formed: the official goal of the project is to find effective means of combating coronavirus infection.

It is reported that during the year of work of the COVID-19 HPC Consortium, 43 participants have joined the project, almost all of them are huge corporations and closed labs tightly related with goverments. The work of the consortium is organized without the exchange of open information. Instead, the initiative provides the necessary resources to perform complex calculations aimed at, officially, finding drugs for the coronavirus.

The total power of computing resources within the project already reached 600 Pflops. 165 thousand nodes are involved, which has a total of 6.8 million processor cores and approximately 50 thousand graphics accelerators.

According to IBM Research, the HPC Consortium's COVID-19 initiative has proven to be effective. Using the experience gained, the organizers began the implementation of a larger NSCR project.

Its essence lies in the formation of an international organization that can provide computing resources for solving urgent problems of elites.

Note that like Wuhan and similar labs, exactly ZERO information or methods helping treating virus came from this organizations. Contrary to all public claims, yet they keep spending billions on this resources and it can't be for nothing.

Instead, they dedicate almost all of this resources to develop much more dangerous strains of COVID and modified, more efficient spike proteins that will cause auto immune issues.

Lets start from SWIFT.

Vnesheconombank was the first Russian bank to join SWIFT. This happened on December 4, 1989.

Interesting data, isn't it? As US had beep preparing the infrastructure long before 1991.

In each country in which the SWIFT system is deployed, the society creates its own regional administration. In Russia, its functions are performed by the Russian-British telecommunications company Sovam Teleport.

Lets look at more detail at Sovam Teleport.

The company was established as a joint venture between the San Francisco Moscow Teleport network and the All-Russian Research Institute of Applied Automated Systems, the name developed from the abbreviation for Soviet-American Teleport.

Now lets look at this institute and SFMT firm

San Francisco Moscow Teleport (SFMT), ... was launched in 1983 by financier George Soros and other American investors with the support of the US government. The tasks of the project included the creation of new generation communication networks - with the help of SFMT, the Americans were going to promote the newly emerging Internet in Western Europe and the USSR.

The Academy network consisted of 9 interconnected computing subnets of the regional branches of the USSR Academy of Sciences with centers in Moscow, Leningrad, Riga, Kiev, Sverdlovsk, Novosibirsk, Tashkent, Alma-Ata and Khabarovsk. All-Russian Research Institute of Applied Automated Systems was appointed as the central hub, specially for this business was allocated from another amusing organization - the All-Union Scientific Research Institute of System Research.

Lets look further

On the initiative of two countries - the USSR and the USA - the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) was created under the Club of Rome oversee.

In October 1972, the IIASA charter was signed in London by representatives of 12 European states. The Institute is located on the territory of Austria, a neutral country, in the town of Laxenburg, which is near Vienna. The institution was engaged in research and search for solutions to global and universal problems using applied systems analysis.

On June 4, 1976, the Soviet branch of IIASA appeared - the All-Union Scientific Research Institute for System Research (VNIISI) of the State Committee of the Council of Ministers of the USSR for Science and Technology and the Academy of Sciences of the USSR. The institution was entrusted with the functions of the parent organization for the scientific and methodological support of Soviet participation in the activities of IIASA.

All-Union Scientific Research Institute for System Research had been homeland of people who restored capitalism in USSR and also home of all new young anti communist specially trained gang who destroyed USSR economy.