Personal View site logo
Driftwood Settings, Series 5: Cluster v6 ULTRA RELIABLE, Mysteron, Crossfire, Quantum 9B, Sedna...
  • 1029 Replies sorted by
  • @Driftwood Thanks Nick...and I haven't taken more than a few minute with the last one.

    I don't know if it's possible but it would be a big time saver if the testers comments could be posted with a new setting.

    @strancali Unbelievable! That looked as good as Twixtor.

  • @JPB1138 @pundit @Butt @MartinD @oscillian @xavieramelio Wow! guys, some terrific looking varieties from these Driftwood settings. Thanks so much for posting and sharing. Looking great :-)

  • @driftwood Thanks Nick, will try this baby out ;)

  • @pundit first off, rest up! Secondly, any footage from that shot is ok. Doesn't even have to have sound. I just want to see this combo (v6 & the pentax lens) to see how good it looks. If you're up to it, just do like a 10 seconds clip if not, whenever you get to it :)

  • @strancali Thanks. But thank Vitaliy, Nick and all the others for their tireless work in turning this little cam into something that punches way above its weight.

    Don't how much of this session will be usable as he was having several quite severe memory lapses and getting badly stuck on words. (like 10 second pauses every 10 seconds!) Though I'll probably recut some of the dialog and use it as a VO for some of his walk about exterior shots.

    I'm doing another couple of sessions over the next few weeks. I took a few BHTS production stills. His house is so full of stuff you could hardly move.

    Setup was two hours with half of that moving his stuff to make room for the camera, lights and sound. Was coming down with massive head/chest cold towards the end of the day so I'm off for a few days - feel like total crap! 8>P

  • *** NEW *** Cluster v6 6 GOP Variation 'Nebular'.

    Again, primed for a target Qp of 16. After another week's research and beta testing by my test team (with special kudos to @evanflys, @luxis, @Zaven13, @konjow, @onionbrain and @conscius please find attached Cluster v6 'Nebular' - the 6 GOP variation of the previously released 'DREWnet' setting at 12/15 GOP.

    The two settings share striking similarities in the matrix and the only real difference is Nebular's GOP, the 'GOP Related' weighting of bitrate to i, p and b frames, and bitrate to produce a rate control that increases overall bitrate by around 25%. HBR/1080i certainly looks even better. But let YOU be the judge.

    Cluster v6 6 GOP - 24pH.png
    1415 x 869 - 1M
    Cluster v6 6 GOP - 1080i60 streameye depicting a i top field and p bottom field quantisation.png
    1395 x 877 - 853K
    Cluster v6 6 GOP - 720p60 streameye depicting a p slice quantisation.png
    1401 x 691 - 421K
    Cluster_v6_6_GOP 'Nebular' - setf.zip
    2K
  • I am still in awe over @pundit with his screen capture. That's crazy quality right there.

  • @JPB1138 Great grading and feel to it indeed!

  • @peternap believe it or not @pop24 used 1080p slowed at 40%!

  • @pop24 what did you use for the slomo

  • tested Nicks new cluster V6

  • @driftwood looks like vimeo is better? :)

    @pundit Amazing capture, please upload a video asap! Those Pentax lens you have look incredible. What do you think about them, would you recommend these lenses giving its price points?

  • WEB Delivery Test

    A quick compression comparison between Cluster v6 6GOP variation (coming today!) at 720p60 (iA mode on) with;-

    • 1 Original MTS file, screengrab,

    • 2 MTS to ProResLT conversion using Clipwrap, screengrab

    • 3 ProResLT conversion to 50% compression mpeg4 (h264) using mpegStreamClip, screengrab

    • 4 ProResLT conversion to 100% compression mpeg4 (h264) using mpegStreamClip. screengrab

    Now lets upload the 50 percent compression file to Youtube and vimeo and see which looks best using their compression codecs... :-)

    • Original MTS file size: 629MB 33.4Mbps data rate.

    • ProResLT file size: 1.89Gb (!!!) 95.7Mbps data rate.

    • 50% percent mpeg4 file size: 159.3MB 8 039 Kbps data rate (AVC Baseline@L3.1).

    • 100% percent mpeg4 file size: 1.34Gb 69.8 Mbps data rate (AVC Baseline@L4.2).

    Vimeo:

    You Tube:

    1. Cluster v6 6 GOP Candidate 5 720p60 iA mode - mts Original - Screen shot 2012-07-05 at 14.10.43.png
    2560 x 1440 - 2M
    2. Cluster v6 6 GOP Candidate 5 720p60 iA mode - Clipwrap 2 ProResLT transcoded -Screen shot 2012-07-05 at 14.12.31.png
    2560 x 1440 - 3M
    3. Cluster v6 6 GOP Candidate 5 720p60 iA mode - clipwrap__prores LT to mpegstreamclip m-peg4 h264 compression at 50percent render - Screen shot 2012-07-05 at 14.14.35.png
    2560 x 1440 - 2M
    4. Cluster v6 6 GOP Candidate 5 720p60 iA mode - clipwrap__prores LT to mpegstreamclip m-peg4 h264 compression at 100percent render - Screen shot 2012-07-05 at 14.16.41.png
    2560 x 1440 - 2M
  • @driftwood Re Cluster in-camera playback. No worries.

    I used Cluster V6 today on a doco shoot. From what I can tell after a brief look on a dodgy Netbook the MTS files look good. Some full-res ungraded frame captures attached.

    Cluster V6, 24p, Smooth, -2,-2,-2,-2, ISO160 Lenses: Pentax FA31 LTD F1.8 (1st) and Pentax SMC-A 50mm F1.4 (2nd & 3rd) All 1/50th @ F3.2

    00005.MTS.png
    1920 x 1080 - 3M
    00026.MTS.png
    1920 x 1080 - 2M
    00038.MTS.png
    1920 x 1080 - 2M
  • @driftwood what cluster version would u recommend for 25p

  • Here is a link to the video.

    @Rerbreg I use Smooth -2, -2, -2, -2 all the time. Not sure if I'm locked into using that for good. But most of the videos I see that I like best come from that profile.

    The weird artifacting in the sky in some shots is due to youtube destroying the grain i put on the video. I use rgrain, looks great in original tho.

    Here is the vimeo version where you can download the original (well at least uncompressed h264, cant upload pro res to vimeo because Im not a PLUS member)

  • @jpb1138 very nice, can't wait to see the video :)

  • Short test with Cluster v6 12/15 GOP. Almost positive that I used the Optic Zoom 2x with this short clip. I shot a bit in 2x and 4x mode. Most of the 2x footage was decent quality, but 4x was pushing it (bad quality) ...no surprise. There was an overcast (very cloudy) this evening ...natural light was not ideal, but I still like the test clip.

    HBR/1080i, Standard, {-2.-2.-2.-2}, ISO:800, ss:50 (should have been 60 or better), Aperture: ?,
    Memory card: Lexar 'Platinum II' 32GB class 10
    Lens: Nikon 135mm/f2.8 fixed focal length lens
    Audio: The GH2's internal microphone was used.

    No grading, no correction or any other improvements made on original footage. The original *.mts file was uploaded to YouTube.

    Attachments Below:
    One screen-capture, a StreamParser v2.10 report (with camera selected as GH2) and a MediaInfo report. I couldn't erase the duplicate MediaInfo document (Duck_33.txt) or the first 'junk' StreamParser report. Kept getting the following error: {"Code":401,"Exception":"You don't have permission to do that."}

    Questions:
    Why does StreamParser v2.10 post "mode: 1080i60" and MediaInfo post "frame rate: 29.97 fps"? Why 60 in one report and 29.97 in the other? ...both reports state "interlaced"? The same *.mts file was used for both reports ...the path names for the file are identical.

    33_White_Duck.jpg
    1920 x 1080 - 920K
    33_StreamParser_v2.10.gif
    1298 x 685 - 72K
    Duck_33.txt
    3K
    33_MediaInfo.txt
    3K
    33_StreamParser__v210.gif
    1292 x 679 - 77K
  • JPB1138 What profile do you use?

  • Will be uploading a little Sedna Tonight after work, ETA 2 Hours. Just some outdoor at-sunset type shots on a horse farm and in a cornfield. Was dissapointed at first glance of footage.. Due to the overly contrasty-ness of the GH2 (still hoping for the picture profile customizer hack. HA) But after grading it I really think I turned it nicely. Has a certain feel to it. I'm a cinema guy and have little love for super glossy look of commercials. Stay tuned.

    Here are some stills comparing, original first then graded:

    Video coming down shortly.

    Screen Shot 2012-07-05 at 12.05.12 AM.png
    1898 x 1068 - 2M
    Screen Shot 2012-07-05 at 12.03.59 AM.png
    1912 x 815 - 2M
    Screen Shot 2012-07-05 at 12.02.12 AM.png
    1901 x 1068 - 2M
    Screen Shot 2012-07-05 at 12.03.32 AM.png
    1913 x 1025 - 2M
    Screen Shot 2012-07-05 at 12.02.36 AM.png
    1897 x 1066 - 2M
    Screen Shot 2012-07-05 at 12.03.15 AM.png
    1918 x 813 - 2M
  • Little test of an interview I made and I am editing, all with Cluster v4 6GOP variation, 24h the dance part was recorded at ISO 1600 due to bad lighting at the place, no color grading yet, clips as they came out of the camera. @driftwood I am loving this patch for this kind of work, Is Cluster v6 very different? also Will Cluster V6 6GOP be different in wich way? Thank you

  • Cluster v6 6GOP variation is nearing completion. Trying to adjust for spanning and looking at timing issues in h264 and other things to help...

    If anyone would like to join our beta test group for GOP6 variation please let me know via pm (conversation)

  • @driftwood Thank you. This cluster V6 looks really really great. First time I changed settings since 9b and i don't regret it !

  • Cluster v6 Works fine on a Kingston 16gb class 4 but no span on the other hand Spans fine with a Sandisk 128Gb 45Mb card H24 HBR will test my Sandisk 16Gb 30Mb and 45Mb cards tomorrow for spanning

  • Great quality

This topic is closed.
← All Discussions