Gordon Laing from Cameralabs uploaded some videos to vimeo, original available for download
I did a play in Videolan player, a quadcore computer cannot playback any file... Computer must be huge for 4k 10bit 422 and for 4k 60p.
Edit post: I did a try in other player and I can do the play, Media Player Classic and KMPlayer, both can do a good playback in the quadcore computer (10bit 25p and 30p play fine, 60p and 50p 8bit sttuter a little, processor is not enough for it maybe)
I just compare many locations on the test image at a reasonable iso like 800 and comparing with the Olympus find the GH5 to be a little better. There is some smoothing it seems going on in the Olympus that reduces fine detail. GH5 also seems to handle highlight detail better. Being a convert to M4/3 it is only of passing interest how it compares to other systems.
I find the Gh5 image quality to be very good up to ISO 3200 (if not the best compared to the other APSC and m4/3 cameras out there) with a good balance between NR, details, sharpness and very nice colors. Unfortunately stating with ISO 6400 the NR is way to strong.
Why compare GH5 iso200 with A65000 iso100? GH5 has iso100 and it is better than iso200.
Iso100 will be very good in video, especially in ex-tele or in other 100% sensor modes. GH4 iso200 is noisy in 100% sensor view (4k and ex-tele).
The Blur or loss of detail increases with each ISO. ISO 200 with NR set at 6 has more detail than ISO 400 with NR set to 1.
yes they are. Im not sure if f8 is main reason however.
@konjow , those images are terrible! Shot at diffraction apertures over f/8, with sharpness dialed down in camera and firmware 0.4.
@Vitaliy_Kiselev , up to ISO 3200 they look very good, starting with ISO 6400 the NR is to strong as you said.
The blur is strong with GH5
http://www.imaging-resource.com/news/2017/02/14/panasonic-gh5-beta-first-shots
@caveport , here's a portrait taken with the GH5: https://www.ephotozine.com/user/joshwa-136701/gallery/photo/lucy--studio-shoot--49924955
A bit too wide to evaluate skin tones.
@caveportcaveport , there is a photo with people in it: https://www.flickr.com/photos/cameralabs/31977256174
@Eno It's a shame there are no shots of people to see how skin tones look.
Panasonic Lumix GH5 sample images:
http://www.cameralabs.com/reviews/Panasonic_Lumix_GH5/sample_images.shtml
Sorry for 2Mt photo :)
GH5 photo is shot with 20mm II. GH4 exif dont tell the lens. Both are with AWB so it tells something about color/WB fidelity. Here are exif for both:
I think before matching color on the Gh5, the exposure must be matched first, cause it's totally different vs the GH4.
One observation, looking into the Exif I see the firmware version is 0.5 (beta stage). :)
Suggest to use Flickr or such for larger things.
Also, you need to match color first before any ISO comparison.
Wow, thanks a lot @Vitaliy_Kiselev!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!