That's actually a thing that worries me. The longer it takes to get some great footage due to conditions and hands the more I think this is not a camera I should even consider. There are 'always' some conditions and hands, somewhere, allowing good footage. But that's not the way I think a camera should be. It shouldn't get into your way.
@JuMo Yep, agreed. I know a studio here in LA that used the 200 up unit last year. All their cameras were stolen so they upgraded to the 250.
As for the Pocket, it's so close. No matter what people say about Bloom, when I say his stuff, I felt pretty excited about the camera again. Some of the best stuff I've seen from it but he knows how to expose a shot....period. And that's half the battle with these BM cameras.
Good points, you might be right about people blind-faithing because: ProResHQ! I'll always have a soft spot for the old workhorse HVX200. So many memories. So much squinting (that screen gave me more headaches than whisky). I know a few studios that still keep them around and will probably have them kicking around somewhere until the end of time. Re: the pocket cam - it feels like we're all still waiting to see what this little thing can really do in the right conditions / hands.
@JuMo I know, I'm just being an idiot :) Actually it seems like they are doing the opposite and thinking they can blow the highlights and pull them back in post. I think people believe ProResHQ is like RAW since most are coming from DSLRs.
Myself, I started on an HVX200 so I was used to a good ProRes codec already. You still need to make the choice on this camera with highlights and shadows. Just think most people are making the wrong choices. I don't know, maybe it's just me but if I shot some stuff with one of these cameras and it looked just like DSLR footage, I wouldn't post it. Trust me, I have a crap load of horrible BMCC footage I've shot since I bought it. Do I post that as a test..... hell no!!!! Right in the trash bin it goes!! :)
lol, hopefully not on purpose, but so far it does seem that even experienced DSLR shooters are having a hard time wrapping their head around exposing this camera properly. To me it pretty much looks like a lot of people are shooting like it's a baked in 8bit codec - trashing potentially usable data in favour of getting the skin tones (or whatever subject) in 'the zone', often leaving huge headroom on one end or the other. This type of camera may require a different type of approach than what the actual target demographic of this camera is accustomed to. Personally, I'm thrilled that lower budget projects can realistically start moving away from the 5-7 stop DR, baked in like a left over lasagna, blow your highlights out your ass, type of shooting. I expect that a lot of us will be cringing at our DSLR days in the near future.
I'm really starting to think people are exposing this thing wrong on purpose now ;)
@rlima Eh, to me those videos were among the worst I've seen. Sorry but all the skies were blown out during the day so they didn't know how to expose there. Looked just like GH2 or GH3 footage to me. And then once again people are trying to open this camera up at night as far as they can and yet again, we not only see the Orbs of deception but they are accompanied by the Black Spots of Misfortune. Somehow this person managed to expose everything wrong! A mighty fine feat if you ask me :)
To be clear, the dynamic range of the camera stayed the same, it was the exposure that was all over the map. The first video was mostly overexposed and the second video was mostly underexposed (and not corrected in post). I think with the white orb issue, this camera should only shoot at night in VERY controlled lighting environments. It's not doing well as a run and gun cam at night (sorry doc shooters).
@Wilbo One thing I'd like to bring up, though it's only for people with more than 1 type of BM camera, I'd hate to try and watch shots while shooting with both cameras as I imagine many of would be shooting with both. If you're just shooting with one type, no big deal but both, might run into some problems.
Mmmm... two more vids... dynamic range is everywhere, so as some blooming...
IMHO, the blooming really doesn't bother me that much. I didn't notice it at all until everyone started talking about it but I think I could chalk it up to a unique characteristic of the camera if that was the only issue...
The game stopping problem for me is still the weird shutter/cadence. I could live with the globes :)
@Flaaandeeers Opps, you got me. I guess i missed that one out of the 50 tweets a day that he does ;)
OMG now the white blobs on our nightmares.... lol... All this talk is wierd.. didn't them tested for this problem before? This is a well-documented issue related to sensor construction. How the sensor behaves under strong clipping situations? Should be on their check-list!! So, all those desirable portrait shots for extreme bokeh with our f0.95 lenses in downtown at night are under real risk?? ;(
@theconformist Same golf ball blooming in the highlights than you can see more clear in this example that I grab from BM forum:
@Flaaandeeers I'm confused, what am I missing about this photo?
@Ian_T - I'm pretty sure that Ive seen it in all the BMPC footage Ive seen. It's in JB's footage, and all the new owners footage that has been recently loaded to youtube, and vimeo.
I think maybe most of ya'll are making something out of nothing really. One thing is for sure...this issue does not show up in every video out there. It could either be what some already claim as over-exposure or only appears on certain faulty cameras. If so there's a workaround for both. The first...careful with over-exposing...or the later...return your camera for a working one. Regardless I'll just wait for a response from BM on this.
Personally...I think this might be mainly related to ProRes. Maybe RAW will show something different.
EDIT: I doubt over-exposure.
The problem seems to be your eye now Brian, not PB's. Gotta look better ;)
https://twitter.com/PhilipBloom/status/371402708508766208/photo/1
@No_Surrender Most likely true (on both accounts).
@RRRR Not that I know what you do for a living(beyond cinematography)... but Joe certainly knows more about building cameras than the two of us I would image ...granted Its kinda like asking Darth Vader why the good side of the force is screwed up.
@LongJohnSilver Philip is a better business man than a DP. His massive ego and the ability to BS everyone has brought him a long way in life. In my opinion nothing he has done is ground breaking in anyway. He just somehow gets to be one of the first to play with new toys, so we all pay attention. He doesn't have the eye a lot of DP's have, so it doesn't surprise me if he didn't see it.
@WarrantyVoided The way Philip tweets about nearly everything including if he has to go to the bathroom, I would think if he noticed it, he would have tweeted about it. I bet he is recutting his "Part 2" to include it now, like he saw it the whole time.
If you see these kind of blobs on footage that is not over-exposed (in cam) we might have to start to worry.
Is there a possible fix? I don´t know, but there sure are ways to avoid getting these issues (if over-exposure is a key factor).
Joe Rubinstein doesn´t seem like a good authority on camera manufacture - in regards to his hypothesis I wonder why glass would produce an artifact that doesn´t look like an optical effect? And why would he know anything about the issues bmd had with the bmc? (other than what was publicly told). It´s not like he has anything to gain by adding fuel to this matter. :S
So based on the criticism presented thus far (blooming, black spots, extremely short battery life, limited recording times, etc) is the general consensus to have faith or.... pass up the BMPCC and wait for something better?
@LongJohnSilver I wouldn't say he didn't notice it just because he didn't post a frame on Twitter, which he did earlier on with the black spot. The second part of his review is all about actually using the camera, so it could be he mentions it in that one.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!