Personal View site logo
200 years in 4 minutes
  • 7 Replies sorted by
  • A clever way of teaching and making people think.

  • It made me aware of, how stupid people things about over-population problem, and that's why measures of control are being taken. That's what happen when you mess with nature of things...

    What make this more useless than it already is, is that 200 years ago with 400 dll in almost everywhere people could live much better than we do now with 40,000 dll mostly because off industrialization, competition, crowded spaces insecurity and contamination. Yes you can have a nice house with lots of "luxury" and "commodity", but if you see the real charts in practice people are more unhappy more stupid, and much less human in what respect values. As off life expectancy, this is so wrong people where adults at the age of 14/16 top an now so often you see 40 year children ruled by emotions. And with health food and air to breed was not difficult to see people living more than 100 years, that is almost impossible nowadays.

    More abusive is how they speculate over the future, as if in reality it really pushed you over living towards a perfect green world for more than 100 years with much much more richness. :-)

    SO THIS BRAIN-WASHING MANIPULATION MERCHANDISING STRATEGY, is no good just wants you to think how everything is just growing/evolving as it supposed to.

    BIG BIG LIE

    Those who pay these statistics, are the ones who don't give a SH1T about human rights or the health of our planet.

  • As much as half of all the food produced in the world – equivalent to 2bn tonnes – ends up as waste every year, engineers warned in a report published on Thursday.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2013/jan/10/half-world-food-waste


    Buckminster Fuller: The Malthusian Lie and The Overpopulation Myth

    Malthus was wrong. He forgot a factor: our continual ability to do more and more with less and less.

    "Ephemeralization," Fuller called it. Not long ago America telephoned Europe via 175,000 tons of transatlantic copper cables. Now a single quarter-ton communications satellite does the job better, faster, clearer, with more bandwidth and a fraction of the energy. Malthus could not have conceived of modern refrigeration, transportation or electronics.(Transistors are an example of doing almost anything with practically nothing.)

    http://www.myspace.com/quantumkat/blog/71076657

    World Game, .... developed by Buckminster Fuller in 1961 to help create solutions to overpopulation and the uneven distribution of global resources.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Game

  • Malthus was wrong. He forgot a factor: our continual ability to do more and more with less and less.

    Yes, yes, wait, may be we have simple explanation for this:

    image

    And Malthus was not really wrong?

    Not long ago America telephoned Europe via 175,000 tons of transatlantic copper cables. Now a single quarter-ton communications satellite does the job better, faster, clearer, with more bandwidth and a fraction of the energy.

    And this is just bullshit :-)