Personal View site logo
Make sure to join PV on Telegram or Facebook! Perfect to keep up with community on your smartphone.
Please, support PV!
It allows to keep PV going, with more focus towards AI, but keeping be one of the few truly independent places.
GH2 - Difraction test for the M.ZD 45mm F/1.8 - 100% Crops.
  • When comparing neighboring apertures the effect it's not very apparent but usually comparing crops 2/3EV apart you will see a difference. Having said that, I can say I'm pretty confortable up to f/11-13 even though if you compare to f/9 you can spot a marginal difference. These are 100% crops. Had to shoot these at ISO640 because that was the needed amplification for F22@2fps. Shot on tripod with constant lighting. At very wide apertures (F/5.6 and faster) there is flickering from the lighting but it doesn't make a difference for this purpose.

    BTW I also tested with a chart on the center and another on the corner but the diffraction settles in equally as expected, so I'm publishing this test where I zoomed in on the chart and it's easier to see the differences.

    A zip file with all images is also here: http://www.mediafire.com/?hwotq64ixux4z9k

    f1.8.png
    864 x 700 - 437K
    f2.0.png
    864 x 700 - 425K
    f2.2.png
    864 x 700 - 421K
    f2.5.png
    864 x 700 - 430K
    f2.8.png
    864 x 700 - 425K
    f3.2.png
    864 x 700 - 425K
    f3.5.png
    864 x 700 - 420K
    f4.0.png
    864 x 700 - 410K
    f4.5.png
    864 x 700 - 415K
    f5.0.png
    864 x 700 - 432K
    f5.6.png
    864 x 700 - 432K
    f6.3.png
    864 x 700 - 427K
    f7.1.png
    864 x 700 - 408K
    f8.0.png
    864 x 700 - 401K
    f9.0.png
    864 x 700 - 401K
    f10.png
    864 x 700 - 419K
    f11.png
    864 x 700 - 412K
    f13.png
    864 x 700 - 412K
    f14.png
    864 x 700 - 404K
    f16.png
    864 x 700 - 402K
    f18.png
    864 x 700 - 394K
    f20.png
    864 x 700 - 397K
    f22.png
    864 x 700 - 379K
  • 9 Replies sorted by
  • @Vitaliy_Kiselev : I wondered whether I should post that in the Lenses Section, but then I though "Diffraction is a sensor characteristic" so it will be similar for all lenses that out-resolve the sensor (and at video resolutions mostly all will) so I posted here in the Camera Section.

  • @duartix Great to see the tests. :)

    Though diffraction affects all lenses, the aperture where you start to lose resolution varies from lens to lens.

  • This test is extremely useful for astrophotography which I am heavily invested(literally) right now. Most scopes are F10 out of the box. Any barlows at all will push it out to F20 and beyond.

    I bought an 8" 800mm F4.0 scope so I can use a 3x barlow without much issue. I have a 2x, 3x, and 5x on the way. I can also use the 2.6x and 3.9x ETC features to get around the diffraction issue at extreme amplification.

    I laugh when everyone asks why there isn't a 800mm F4.0 lens for m4/3s. Attached is a picture of a reasonably priced 800mm F4.0 lens. Trust me this will not fit in your pocket.

    P1710615_resize.jpg
    1600 x 1200 - 447K
  • @mpgxsvcd : Is it stabilised? How much was "heavily invested"? And I don't mean pounds... oh wait, perhaps I do, where in the planet are you?

  • A 600mm f/4.0 Canon L series costs over $10,000 U.S. - tack on another $500 or so for 2x extender. Not sure how the telescopes compare but that`s the most expensive I used for astrophotography so far and with the case it was ca. 30 lbs to carry around.

  • I live in North Carolina in the US. The 8" Astro tech weighs about 20 pounds. The scope itself was only $499 and it is just about perfect for most deep space objects. The real cost is a decent Goto German equatorial mount and all of the accessories that go with it. I have about $2000 invested into those.

    The scope wouldn't be very useful for day time application. It is very useful for AP though.

    I am working on a video tutorial on how to do Astro Photography from a heavily light polluted back yard on a budget. We finally have clear skies tonight so most of the footage will come from tonight's session.

  • LOL I have exactly the same set-up 8" F5 reflector - sadly bang in the middle of London - got some nice shots of Jupiter and moons though the other day

  • @soundgh2

    I find that the 2 minute 8 second exposure limit of the GH2 means focal ratio is everything. That is why I went with the F4.0 scope instead of an F5.0 or greater. The 800mm focal length is nice as well. It allows me to frame the full moon in 16:9 perfectly and Orion's Nebula just fills the frame.