Source images and more info - http://matthayslett.com/salt-iii-high-speed-lens-shootout-wfo/

I just got my GH3 today, and of course the first thing I had to do was this test. I threw the GH1 in there out of curiosity since I had one lying around. It looks like the GH series hasn't had much progress in the highlights, but the shadow detail has gotten much better. The GH1 and GH2 were hacked while the GH3 was using the stock 50mbps IPB setting. I chose this over the Intra because of reports that it held up better due to a more efficient compression algorithm (I don't know though since I've only had the camera for a day).

I used the cameras' spot meters on the big square gray patch (which is supposedly 18% gray), but I think the GH1 was a little hotter than the other two cameras when correctly exposed. Base ISO was used on all three cameras to achieve maximum DR. In post, I raised or lowered each image by one stop increments with Colorista II to compensate for the increased or lowered exposure levels. Hope someone finds this as useful as I have!

I think what Coppola to see shots of the GH2 was somewhat familiar with this movie great unknown but which he felt so proud. I'd love to ask him about it, but that is almost impossible.

Excuse me if this thread its trivial and offtopic, but wanted to share this impression.

And I recommend to all screenwriters and directors see this movie frugal, sometimes with limited resources and without a very complex story, but well told and surprising elements can do a good job in this case is a masterpiece.

Attached some pictures of it.

PS: Sorry for my poor English.

To me it was the most interesting part (except for the boring interviews, of course), as it finally allowed to really see the technical camera differences. And still, the GH2 was IMHO pretty good for its low price point, especially in the "wall shot".

BTW: At 00h:27m:44s, "Nancy Schreiber" looks kind of ... unexpected. ;-)

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/zacuto-announces-release-of-revenge-of-great-camera-shootout-2012-04-10

The cameras involved are:

1. Sony F65 -- Sony Representatives
2. ARRI Alexa -- Rodney Charters, ASC
3. RED Epic -- Ryan Walters
4. Sony FS100 -- Den Lennie & Mick Jones
5. Sony F3 w/slog -- Nancy Schreiber, ASC
6. Canon C300 -- Polly Morgan
7. Canon 7D with Technicolor settings -- Michael Negrin, ASC
8. Panasonic GH2 (hacked and non-hacked) -- Jonny Zeller & Colt Seman

"'Revenge' is unlike any other camera test that I've ever been involved with," says Zacuto producer, Scott Lynch. "I believe that the tools available to us are all capable of creating great looking images, but only if you know how to use them. The big challenge for us was creating a test that would bring out the real world differences between these cameras. You can shoot charts which will give you scientific results, but that environment is not the real world. What we wanted to know was how cinematographers creatively solve the limitations of their camera. There are going to be some great discussions when this test gets released. People are going to be blown away."

Look at http://www.prgtrucolor.com/node/16

Article about shootout - http://provideocoalition.com/index.php/aadams/story/led_light_tests_prg_sponsors_an_LED_light_shootout/

They ahve some problems with independence claims (as it was paid comparison).

But watching spectrums and color accuracy is interesting.